Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2023 09:47:03 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
CC:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
        <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] kbuild: Per arch/platform dtc warning levels
Message-ID: <20231123-sugar-aviator-337b290f899b@wendy>
References: <20231122-dtc-warnings-v2-0-bd4087325392@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TlOjZ7bCqwxiOxdz"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231122-dtc-warnings-v2-0-bd4087325392@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

--TlOjZ7bCqwxiOxdz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 03:12:31PM -0700, Rob Herring wrote:
> This series adds support to set the dtc extra warning level on a per=20
> arch or per platform (directory really) basis.
>=20
> The first version of this was just a simple per directory override for=20
> Samsung platforms, but Conor asked to be able to do this for all of=20
> riscv.
>=20
> For merging, either I can take the whole thing or the riscv and samsung=
=20
> patches can go via their normal trees. The added variable will have no=20
> effect until merged with patch 2.

IMO, you should take the lot.

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.

--TlOjZ7bCqwxiOxdz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZV8flwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0gy+AP42cyrUTh4NL4eY8kIwsVmx5LejeoA0QZDYa85yy0PBgQD9EGKZIEXssWsj
vX2Y6dIUhPn8qia5tz+YByAjUriTEAE=
=2rQT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TlOjZ7bCqwxiOxdz--