Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.34;
Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:32:44 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
CC:     Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
        Yu-Chien Peter Lin <peterlin@andestech.com>,
        <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>, <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
        <guoren@kernel.org>, <jszhang@kernel.org>,
        <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <will@kernel.org>,
        <anup@brainfault.org>, <dminus@andestech.com>,
        <dylan@andestech.com>, <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
        <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
        <locus84@andestech.com>, <tim609@andestech.com>,
        <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <rdunlap@infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <evan@rivosinc.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] perf: RISC-V: Move T-Head PMU to CPU
 feature alternative framework
Message-ID: <20231123-edge-skinless-3ec70c2958c9@wendy>
References: <20231019140119.3659651-1-peterlin@andestech.com>
 <20231019-predator-quartet-e56f43d5aa8d@spud>
 <ZTJAYqk_DnrR9-Sc@APC323>
 <20231020-snippet-diffusive-1a6052d52aae@spud>
 <ZTTmtVnZrioRWpJx@APC323>
 <20231023-impulse-quickness-4c7076e6eb58@spud>
 <a0a95390-ac9e-4d82-9727-d4880e5e48ae@sholland.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EPTcSEsndYxsXW5r"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a0a95390-ac9e-4d82-9727-d4880e5e48ae@sholland.org>
Precedence: bulk

--EPTcSEsndYxsXW5r
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:43:09PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:

> PMU support is not required to boot, and it didn't really work correctly =
anyway
> until OpenSBI commit c9a296d0edc9 ("platform: generic: allwinner: fix OF =
process
> for T-HEAD c9xx pmu"), which is still not in any released OpenSBI version.
>=20
> So I am fine with requiring a devicetree update for continued PMU support.

Okay, would be nice to get an ack on the relevant parts of the most recent
iteration of the series confirming this :)

--EPTcSEsndYxsXW5r
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZV9ijAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0jzqAP99wSNOFoSEnhErwZWcLiwLSjE+zabiRoiFl3LNjc8IoAEAxwsezaMF/4hx
55Y2gIY06+bjvIcZKyXPokGQMOmbcAU=
=dCRP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--EPTcSEsndYxsXW5r--