Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4;
Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:11:47 -0500
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 04/12] mm: Introduce vma_pgtable_walk_{begin|end}()
Message-ID: <ZV95w730I45Y-XcK@x1n>
References: <20231116012908.392077-1-peterx@redhat.com>
 <20231116012908.392077-5-peterx@redhat.com>
 <ZV7+KqGP9iG6+QaH@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZV7+KqGP9iG6+QaH@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:24:26PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks good:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

One thing I'd prefer double check is this email in the R-b is different
from From:.  Should I always use lst.de for either tags and CCs for my
future versions?  Let me know if that matters.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu