Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758784AbXK1WBL (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:01:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756360AbXK1WA6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:00:58 -0500 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:41381 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755672AbXK1WA5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:00:57 -0500 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:00:57 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Greg KH cc: Kay Sievers , Kernel development list , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: make sure kobj->ktype is set before kobject_init In-Reply-To: <20071128214502.GA3255@kroah.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1751 Lines: 39 On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:42:00PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > This patch (as1020) adds a check to kobject_init() to insure that the > > ktype field is not NULL. This is just for safety's sake; as far as I > > know there are no remaining places where the field is left unset. But > > ironically, kset_init() did fail to set it! The patch fixes that and > > removes some redundant initialization in kset_createa(). > > > > The patch also fixes up elevator_init(), where ktype was set after > > calling kobject_init() instead of before. > > No, it's safe to set ktype after kobject_init, it was just not safe to > set the kset. As Kay pointed out, I just added a patch to my tree to > resolve this issue, and I'll go back and update the documentation now. > > I do like the "check for a ktype" warning, I'll go add that to my local > tree and see what breaks. Odds are, all the static kobjects will :( You have to be careful. The ktype check I wrote lives in kobject_init() -- that's why I had to make elevator_init() assign the ktype before calling kobject_init(). If you put the check into kobject_add() instead then you won't end up checking objects that get initialized but not added. Yes, nobody would deliberately use a kobject without adding it, but it could happen as the result of an failure between the _init and _add calls. In any case, the change to kset_init() in my patch fixes a real bug. It never did set the ktype at all. Alan Stern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/