Received: by 2002:a05:7412:419a:b0:f3:1519:9f41 with SMTP id i26csp953628rdh; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 01:50:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFF1idl+tT65u4z+BwcucXvQfqCmPR2Y8VagDMOrHveMg3hy3xftlWaCB9MyWQ0cGHryJMx X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:820f:b0:1cf:78fc:4867 with SMTP id x15-20020a170902820f00b001cf78fc4867mr1706815pln.52.1700819405194; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 01:50:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1700819405; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kg/DK6SdjkwHqtef8zAp6i5+MzX/D4gro9R9aMWA8PW4hC/JaQJXAkQzhxI+kMWO8e 36XCCD5eqVAr9LHnAV/1d7p3h1hOoMDWZOMi1KnKZj7zBIub6kuNkymRih5ITFDwaMr7 sodLdRyKr9mpkBrfSf02wogSWS9s8Dm2A0lu6GYQ5ODV5q8h5XbOo4F1XfRjAPfQhaPI CJl3coaZz2JbyhvaSy1sDbB3gNSi6CynE4zbEfa8tkC6cpwy59J9a+bvU/OpHg210x6y oqO1DrHrRpblDxL+YHlhCZ626clP3pyq4Tp8QZWhstPFKj1xNGdGhrSYAYO+UATSBmIB 7bPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=BsZ2syQkN7b/+BhmaudchsewzHQR6d5b9l8NcgLfGfQ=; fh=cwx6z2Ni2KNfEB/Sqq6Uf6j08R6r5Gd4OcAuG374YlA=; b=XVocBT+ZA7i2EPQk08c6rNtPKVlXlEVmwpORNZXQ1PxosrpqBFZm2wFdFbsIWfwYIK QiNIbgAVY7Q517Wc/p296FyMi2KK9iNqPkNnel9G908mM+4TjSuqMg2Q3p/cU8TRxFGL CU+iZO1qLL5/LG24oVXWmSRfuMJwbMYzjSgCHqyYq3Puf+7V01d40SrOVKvn0gd18RQ0 Usrl/P0XEc251A+wccSnSexc1JT59fglKTrAoyUcGHLqHil7LOftU3mhzGeTl5kyKoZ7 lDz2aTIoz5UhF0ZCsNQ+N3KwnAbY1qmbWdjTz6TU9Jvjj3wQMIl1cyvDzqIC3peqprcc kVcg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b="nRL/HmOA"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from groat.vger.email (groat.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j6-20020a170902da8600b001cf7d7b941esi3147332plx.300.2023.11.24.01.50.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Nov 2023 01:50:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b="nRL/HmOA"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by groat.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29C28376BEB; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 01:50:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.11 at groat.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230344AbjKXJt3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Nov 2023 04:49:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54122 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345336AbjKXJtW (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2023 04:49:22 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x344.google.com (mail-ot1-x344.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::344]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4775C171D; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 01:49:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x344.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6d67d32adc2so979968a34.2; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 01:49:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1700819363; x=1701424163; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=BsZ2syQkN7b/+BhmaudchsewzHQR6d5b9l8NcgLfGfQ=; b=nRL/HmOAtuIt/rMuTXz0XTbu13/axxKQ8RLTkSGXZzj2XJH3tz85pnM8ttBQ8Muowv yD4KxQNU3FUBouVoUg0xahyf6aLT+MxVWN33R4p+biOgVXa70HXQwSrCKyIJw0S0ze37 oXpZ9+GY7sjejw04krs7l0mCL12qKcs4IrUFqH4T3+kXITnAkBKoJ8jnGYs3Z6BzpzkR JMz70JaEWAHCKpGV4Xy7wi21L8U4n1GPu2S8L7D/coCuqYMcBQC3jI4ce3FsmHj5LXML 97hmoUZ3mAjJ8zBJKO0CUCbV0gCq55nysIJIQNu7HpJYSwordSbaPsE1haM9t0WmyvdV t2gA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700819363; x=1701424163; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BsZ2syQkN7b/+BhmaudchsewzHQR6d5b9l8NcgLfGfQ=; b=KM5k6z9meQw+V/CbNtAfpak5FpCBgTWA8HxOUZbsnJ8k2/p5ZU7rXvDzcDui/13RJt ll2qFnG2ThCj4bns9ZivNnr7Lx5OOZkdF441BjKH6VWww3eXlBA7VDjcguZ/eqgUYwt8 NbLuUlJIGlX68iqFzC95PCcHen8iU2SZyrPT4SAScpycqeYLMwYsnjl1epLNc64yjdUl U0ovYpVS8zF5FyBmwqYc2WHW4xnV8pa9NNkFayiqKQGcIIbPDB59w96ToNPCiGbgoLFY 5KGAPvz5p+YWWjeunPQdeLJATZoLTnNrwF8nK2z8QYGtDrlVfqnGW3njCJp6dsB3BpoE ianw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzNV1QivbEL05XGl9DQM8nMgkXQQ+g/uDOOwDwiE8YsqREggnv6 CwXzEhH2z7dFL6mqRbIyOks= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:735a:0:b0:6bd:ba2c:fbbd with SMTP id l26-20020a9d735a000000b006bdba2cfbbdmr2337284otk.20.1700819363523; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 01:49:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([193.203.214.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t22-20020a634616000000b005c215baacc1sm2734242pga.70.2023.11.24.01.49.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Nov 2023 01:49:22 -0800 (PST) From: xu X-Google-Original-From: xu To: tung.q.nguyen@dektech.com.au Cc: davem@davemloft.net, jmaloy@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, xu.xin.sc@gmail.com, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn, ying.xue@windriver.com, zhang.yunkai@zte.com.cn Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] net/tipc: reduce tipc_node lock holding time in tipc_rcv Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 09:49:19 +0000 Message-Id: <20231124094919.2043838-1-xu.xin16@zte.com.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on groat.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (groat.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 24 Nov 2023 01:50:02 -0800 (PST) >>Could we please solve the problem mentioned above by adding spinlock(&le->lock)? >> > >No, you cannot do that. As I said before, the link status (including l->state) needs to be protected by node lock. Why can't use le->lock instead of node's lock to protect it in tipc_link_rcv. >What I showed you were just 2 use cases (link reset/delete). There are more use cases (netlink, transmit path etc) that need proper locks. The same. We can also add spin_lock_bh(&le->lock) to protect the link in other places where it changes the link status in addition to 'reset/delete'. Because using node lock to protect the link in tipc_link_rcv is really wasting CPU performance. > >>For example: >> >>(BTW, I have tested it, with this change, enabling RPS based on tipc port can improve 25% of general throughput) >> >>diff --git a/net/tipc/node.c b/net/tipc/node.c index 3105abe97bb9..470c272d798e 100644 >>--- a/net/tipc/node.c >>+++ b/net/tipc/node.c >>@@ -1079,12 +1079,16 @@ static void tipc_node_link_down(struct tipc_node *n, int bearer_id, bool delete) >> __tipc_node_link_down(n, &bearer_id, &xmitq, &maddr); >> } else { >> /* Defuse pending tipc_node_link_up() */ >>+ spin_lock_bh(&le->lock); >> tipc_link_reset(l); >>+ spin_unlock_bh(&le->lock); >> tipc_link_fsm_evt(l, LINK_RESET_EVT); >> } >> if (delete) { >>+ spin_lock_bh(&le->lock); >> kfree(l); >> le->link = NULL; >>+ spin_unlock_bh(&le->lock); >> n->link_cnt--; >> } >> trace_tipc_node_link_down(n, true, "node link down or deleted!"); @@ -2154,14 +2158,15 @@ void tipc_rcv(struct net *net, >>struct sk_buff *skb, struct tipc_bearer *b) >> /* Receive packet directly if conditions permit */ >> tipc_node_read_lock(n); >> if (likely((n->state == SELF_UP_PEER_UP) && (usr != TUNNEL_PROTOCOL))) { >>+ tipc_node_read_unlock(n); >> spin_lock_bh(&le->lock); >> if (le->link) { >> rc = tipc_link_rcv(le->link, skb, &xmitq); >> skb = NULL; >> } >> spin_unlock_bh(&le->lock); >>- } >>- tipc_node_read_unlock(n); >>+ } else >>+ tipc_node_read_unlock(n); >> >> /* Check/update node state before receiving */ >> if (unlikely(skb)) { >>@@ -2169,12 +2174,13 @@ void tipc_rcv(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, struct tipc_bearer *b) >> goto out_node_put; >> tipc_node_write_lock(n); >> if (tipc_node_check_state(n, skb, bearer_id, &xmitq)) { >>+ tipc_node_write_unlock(n); >> if (le->link) { >> rc = tipc_link_rcv(le->link, skb, &xmitq); >> skb = NULL; >> } >>- } >>- tipc_node_write_unlock(n); >>+ } else >>+ tipc_node_write_unlock(n); >> } >> >> if (unlikely(rc & TIPC_LINK_UP_EVT))