Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231115165001.2932350-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <CACRpkdbDny8X3WB_qJ4h_vbwrjno5ytAtNMgTeXg4jpegdUH2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMRc=McZJzdj04Ckf_ygDhWNN2JcbTfY+yefOZSYx_nTE_Jpjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdb7QwWcq=mDa4y8bh_QLAFU+X9LCr0chrGVL-_9YE5P9A@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRc=Md+5N_u0QkL+OTc2xVQuxP0dZY-1GbrdGQqwhdJrv4Cbg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Md+5N_u0QkL+OTc2xVQuxP0dZY-1GbrdGQqwhdJrv4Cbg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 25 Nov 2023 00:29:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CACRpkdadxCYg-z5qqp_h+8NhPUy6H4x5Ev06Q_bi_fL16e95OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: don't use gpiod_to_chip()
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:40=E2=80=AFPM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>=
 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:01=E2=80=AFAM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@lin=
aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:06=E2=80=AFPM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev=
.pl> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 2:43=E2=80=AFPM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@=
linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 5:50=E2=80=AFPM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@b=
gdev.pl> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's start working towards removing gpiod_to_chip() from the ker=
nel.
> > > > > Start with pinctrl. The first patch should go through the GPIO tr=
ee
> > > > > and become available through an immutable tag so that we can get =
more
> > > > > conversions in this cycle elsewhere.
> > > >
> > > > Fair enough, maybe an immutable branch with all three patches?
> > > > Probably best to merga all three into both subsystems I think.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Nah, I don't think I need to pollute the GPIO tree with every pinctrl
> > > patch. It's enough to just merge the first one into GPIO and you do
> > > the same in pinctrl.
> >
> > Fair enough, but I need that immutable branch for patch 1 so I
> > can merge the rest on top.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Linus Walleij
>
> I applied the first patch (after fixing the typo in the commit
> message) and sent you the immutable branch to pull. Please apply the
> remaining patches to the pinctrl tree directly.

Pulled it and applied the other two patches on top, thanks!

Yours,
Linus Walleij