Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
Date:   Sun, 26 Nov 2023 14:56:44 +0100
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To:     Rong Tao <rtoax@foxmail.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>,
        Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
        Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, rongtao@cestc.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] prctl: Get private anonymous memory region name
Message-ID: <20231126135644.GA7199@redhat.com>
References: <tencent_77E0BC1E8E9A21CA1B9009DD66555C72A90A@qq.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <tencent_77E0BC1E8E9A21CA1B9009DD66555C72A90A@qq.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Precedence: bulk

On 11/26, Rong Tao wrote:
>
> then the PR_GET_VMA interface should be provided accordingly,
> which is necessary, as the userspace program usually wants to know what
> VMA name it has configured for the anonymous page.

I don't really understand the use-case for PR_GET_VMA ...

But the patch looks reasonable and correct to me.

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>