Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
Date:   Sun, 26 Nov 2023 20:44:25 -0300
From:   "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
        stable-rt <stable-rt@vger.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@suse.com>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
        Jeff Brady <jeffreyjbrady@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 5.10.201-rt98
Message-ID: <ZWPYWRyjRA5sjvdV@uudg.org>
References: <ZV1S4yDcPKwj5_N1@uudg.org>
 <ZV4D1yBGSOE-OVUF@uudg.org>
 <2023112455-anytime-unmapped-ed7d@gregkh>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2023112455-anytime-unmapped-ed7d@gregkh>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 04:11:35PM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:36:23AM -0300, Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 10:01:25PM -0300, Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> > > Hello RT-list!
> > > 
> > > I'm pleased to announce the 5.10.201-rt98 stable release.
> > > 
> > > This release is just an update to the new stable 5.10.201
> > > version and no RT changes have been made.
> > > 
> > > You can get this release via the git tree at:
> > > 
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git
> > > 
> > >   branch: v5.10-rt
> > >   Head SHA1: 3a93f0a0d49dd0db4c6876ca9a7369350e64320e
> > 
> > Greg KH,
> > 
> > While testing v5.10.201-rt98 I stumbled over this warning:
> > 
> >     [ 1000.312397] run blktests nvme/005 at 2023-11-21 21:46:30
> >     ...
> >     [ 1000.500478] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM nvmet_tcp_wq:nvmet_tcp_io_work [nvmet_tcp] is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:0x0
> >     [ 1000.500490] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6 at kernel/workqueue.c:2620 check_flush_dependency+0x11f/0x140
> > 
> > That seems to be fixed by:
> > 
> >     533d2e8b4d5e4 nvmet-tcp: fix lockdep complaint on nvmet_tcp_wq flush during queue teardown
> >         (and depending on what else is backported)
> >         ddd2b8de9f85b nvmet: fix workqueue MEM_RECLAIM flushing dependency
> > 
> > Is this something that can be added to your v5.10 queue or should I carry
> > this fix on v5.10-rt in the meantime?
> 
> That's odd, as this commit is already in the 5.10.138 release, so how
> can we apply it again?

I am really sorry for the confusion on my side. Either myself of the CI I used
mixed up the test branches and ended up using older code. And I missed that
when reviewing the results.
 
> confused,

Sorry again. I owe you a (root?) beer next LPC.

> greg k-h

Best regards,
Luis