Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.36 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.36;
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To:     boris.brezillon@collabora.com
Cc:     robh@kernel.org, steven.price@arm.com,
        maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
        tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel@collabora.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and disable PWRTRANS irq
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 13:45:08 +0100
Message-ID: <20231128124510.391007-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231128124510.391007-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
References: <20231128124510.391007-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Some SoCs may be equipped with a GPU containing two core groups
and this is exactly the case of Samsung's Exynos 5422 featuring
an ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU: the support for this GPU in Panfrost
is partial, as this driver currently supports using only one
core group and that's reflected on all parts of it, including
the power on (and power off, previously to this patch) function.

The issue with this is that even though executing the soft reset
operation should power off all cores unconditionally, on at least
one platform we're seeing a crash that seems to be happening due
to an interrupt firing which may be because we are calling power
transition only on the first core group, leaving the second one
unchanged, or because ISR execution was pending before entering
the panfrost_gpu_power_off() function and executed after powering
off the GPU cores, or all of the above.

Finally, solve this by:
 - Avoid to enable the power transition interrupt on reset; and
 - Ignoring the core_mask and ask the GPU to poweroff both core groups

Fixes: 22aa1a209018 ("drm/panfrost: Really power off GPU cores in panfrost_gpu_power_off()")
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c
index 09f5e1563ebd..bd41617c5e4b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gpu.c
@@ -78,7 +78,12 @@ int panfrost_gpu_soft_reset(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
 	}
 
 	gpu_write(pfdev, GPU_INT_CLEAR, GPU_IRQ_MASK_ALL);
-	gpu_write(pfdev, GPU_INT_MASK, GPU_IRQ_MASK_ALL);
+
+	/* Only enable the interrupts we care about */
+	gpu_write(pfdev, GPU_INT_MASK,
+		  GPU_IRQ_MASK_ERROR |
+		  GPU_IRQ_PERFCNT_SAMPLE_COMPLETED |
+		  GPU_IRQ_CLEAN_CACHES_COMPLETED);
 
 	/*
 	 * All in-flight jobs should have released their cycle
@@ -425,11 +430,10 @@ void panfrost_gpu_power_on(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
 
 void panfrost_gpu_power_off(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
 {
-	u64 core_mask = panfrost_get_core_mask(pfdev);
 	int ret;
 	u32 val;
 
-	gpu_write(pfdev, SHADER_PWROFF_LO, pfdev->features.shader_present & core_mask);
+	gpu_write(pfdev, SHADER_PWROFF_LO, pfdev->features.shader_present);
 	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(pfdev->iomem + SHADER_PWRTRANS_LO,
 					 val, !val, 1, 1000);
 	if (ret)
@@ -441,7 +445,7 @@ void panfrost_gpu_power_off(struct panfrost_device *pfdev)
 	if (ret)
 		dev_err(pfdev->dev, "tiler power transition timeout");
 
-	gpu_write(pfdev, L2_PWROFF_LO, pfdev->features.l2_present & core_mask);
+	gpu_write(pfdev, L2_PWROFF_LO, pfdev->features.l2_present);
 	ret = readl_poll_timeout(pfdev->iomem + L2_PWRTRANS_LO,
 				 val, !val, 0, 1000);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.42.0