Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.34;
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:07:29 +0100 (CET)
From:   Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To:     Yunlong Xing <yunlong.xing@unisoc.com>
cc:     agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yibin.ding@unisoc.com,
        hongyu.jin@unisoc.com, dongliang.cui@unisoc.com,
        xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm: increase the io priority of the kworker-kverityd
 process
In-Reply-To: <20231128094414.583666-1-yunlong.xing@unisoc.com>
Message-ID: <83e8ea6c-1d9-36d5-1c23-da686dbfaf80@redhat.com>
References: <20231128094414.583666-1-yunlong.xing@unisoc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

Hi

This isn't correct - the workqueue process is reused by multiple work 
items - from dm-verity as well as from other subsystems - so you would be 
unexpectedly boosting priority of other tasks.

The correct solution would be to set the ioprio field of the outcoming 
bios in dm-bufio explicitely.

Mikulas


On Tue, 28 Nov 2023, Yunlong Xing wrote:

> From: Hongyu Jin <hongyu.jin@unisoc.com>
> 
> When obtaining the hash value of a high IO priority data block
> from the disk, the kverity-worker that obtains the hash will
> also have a high IO priority to avoid being blocked by other
> IO with low IO priority.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hongyu Jin <hongyu.jin@unisoc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yibin Ding <yibin.ding@unisoc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> index e115fcfe723c..ade9c6734154 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/ioprio.h>
>  
>  #define DM_MSG_PREFIX			"verity"
>  
> @@ -639,7 +640,9 @@ static void verity_finish_io(struct dm_verity_io *io, blk_status_t status)
>  static void verity_work(struct work_struct *w)
>  {
>  	struct dm_verity_io *io = container_of(w, struct dm_verity_io, work);
> +	struct bio *bio = dm_bio_from_per_bio_data(io, io->v->ti->per_io_data_size);
>  
> +	set_task_ioprio(current, bio->bi_ioprio);
>  	io->in_tasklet = false;
>  
>  	verity_fec_init_io(io);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
>