Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 17:31:10 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for framer infrastructure and PEF2256
 framer
Message-ID: <20231128173110.0ccb8f53@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYmN4318b1wXwUOeFjPN0S2w8M9FpXHOs3LtFa+XoTxVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20231128132534.258459-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
        <17b2f126-f6a4-431c-9e72-56a9c2932a88@sirena.org.uk>
        <CACRpkda5VMuXccwSBd-DBkM4W7A1E+UfZwBxWqtqxZzKjrqY4A@mail.gmail.com>
        <511c83d1-d77f-4ac0-927e-91070787bc34@sirena.org.uk>
        <CACRpkdYmN4318b1wXwUOeFjPN0S2w8M9FpXHOs3LtFa+XoTxVw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:51:01 +0100 Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > I thought this thing would be merged primarily into the networking
> > > tree, and I don't know if they do signed tags, I usually create an
> > > immutable branch but that should work just as fine I guess.  
> >
> > Right, I'd expect a signed tag on the immutable branch - it's generally
> > helpful to avoid confusion about the branch actually being immutable.  
> 
> Makes sense, best to create that in the netdev tree if possible
> I guess.

I think you offered creating the branch / tag in an earlier reply,
that's less work for me so yes please! :)

FWIW I usually put the branches / tags in my personal k.org tree.
I don't wanna pollute the trees for the $many people who fetch
netdev with random tags.