Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:07:40 +0900
From:   Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@samsung.com>
To:     Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Cc:     tomasz.figa@gmail.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org,
        s.nawrocki@samsung.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
        linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: samsung: add irq_set_affinity() for non
 wake up external gpio interrupt
Message-ID: <ZWbjPIydJRrPnuDy@perf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPLW+4n0SAOTb6wocY-WjkxgSFMbx+nVuqdaPcNYVDsbfg+EfA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
        boundary="----OVq5TT9zsDSQAN86dWjJc6zPY8CEKIwxCZDtRM.ioT5ZEg4T=_35b7f_"
CMS-TYPE: 102P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <CGME20231126091120epcas2p4a1320e3b0f9be8f8a0f575a322981d38@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
        <20231126094618.2545116-1-youngmin.nam@samsung.com>
        <bb738a6b-815d-4fad-b73f-559f1ba8cd68@linaro.org> <ZWU75VtJ/mXpMyQr@perf>
        <1fd55b36-0837-4bf7-9fde-e573d6cb214a@linaro.org>
        <CAPLW+4n0SAOTb6wocY-WjkxgSFMbx+nVuqdaPcNYVDsbfg+EfA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

------OVq5TT9zsDSQAN86dWjJc6zPY8CEKIwxCZDtRM.ioT5ZEg4T=_35b7f_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 03:35:53PM -0600, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 1:29 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 28/11/2023 02:01, Youngmin Nam wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:54:56AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >> On 26/11/2023 10:46, Youngmin Nam wrote:
> > >>> To support affinity setting for non wake up external gpio interrupt,
> > >>> add irq_set_affinity callback using irq number from pinctrl driver data.
> > >>>
> > >>> Before this patch, changing the irq affinity of gpio interrupt is not possible:
> > >>>
> > >>>     # cat /proc/irq/418/smp_affinity
> > >>>     3ff
> > >>>     # echo 00f > /proc/irq/418/smp_affinity
> > >>
> > >> Does this command succeed on your board?
> > >>
> > > Yes.
> >
> > Hm, fails all the time one mine.
> >
> 
> I tried to test this patch on E850-96, and an attempt to write into
> smp_affinity (for some GPIO irq) also fails for me:
> 
>     # echo f0 > smp_affinity
>     -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error
> 
> When I add some pr_err() to exynos_irq_set_affinity(), I can't see
> those printed in dmesg. So I guess exynos_irq_set_affinity() doesn't
> get called at all. So the error probably happens before
> .irq_set_affinity callback gets called.
> 
> Youngmin, can you please try and test this patch on E850-96? This
> board is already supported in upstream kernel. For example you can use
> "Volume Up" interrupt for the test, which is GPIO irq.
> 

I intened this affinity setting would work only on *Non* Wakeup External Interrupt.
The "Volume Up" on E850-96 board is connected with "gpa0-7" and
that is Wakeup External interrupt so that we can't test the callback.

I couldn't find out a pin for the test on E850-96 board yet.
We can test if there is a usage of *Non" Wake up External Interrupt of GPIO
on E850-96 board.

Do you have any idea ?

Thanks

> > >
> > >>>     # cat /proc/irq/418/smp_affinity
> > >>>     3ff
> > >>>     # cat /proc/interrupts
> > >>>                CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3    ...
> > >>>     418:       3631          0          0          0    ...
> > >>>
> > >>> With this patch applied, it's possible to change irq affinity of gpio interrupt:
> > >>
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >> On which board did you test it?
> > >>
> > >>
> > > I tested on S5E9945 ERD(Exynos Reference Development) board.
> >
> > There is no such board upstream. How can we reproduce this issue? I am
> > afraid we cannot test neither the bug nor the fix.
> >
> > >
> > >>> +   if (parent)
> > >>> +           return parent->chip->irq_set_affinity(parent, dest, force);
> > >>> +
> > >>
> > >> I think there is a  helper for it: irq_chip_set_affinity_parent().
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > The irq_chip_set_affinity_parent() requires parent_data of irq_data.
> >
> > Hm, so now I wonder why do we not have parent_data...
> >
> > > But when I tested as below, exynos's irqd->parent_data was null.
> > > So we should use irqchip's affinity function instead of the helper function.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
> 

------OVq5TT9zsDSQAN86dWjJc6zPY8CEKIwxCZDtRM.ioT5ZEg4T=_35b7f_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


------OVq5TT9zsDSQAN86dWjJc6zPY8CEKIwxCZDtRM.ioT5ZEg4T=_35b7f_--