Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231128132534.258459-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
 <17b2f126-f6a4-431c-9e72-56a9c2932a88@sirena.org.uk> <CACRpkda5VMuXccwSBd-DBkM4W7A1E+UfZwBxWqtqxZzKjrqY4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <511c83d1-d77f-4ac0-927e-91070787bc34@sirena.org.uk> <CACRpkdYmN4318b1wXwUOeFjPN0S2w8M9FpXHOs3LtFa+XoTxVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20231128173110.0ccb8f53@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20231128173110.0ccb8f53@kernel.org>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:00:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbrH-WWVrVWx6MvReUuUW8tU_J8Mb7nW3G8fJGAoiS38g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for framer infrastructure and PEF2256 framer
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 2:31=E2=80=AFAM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wr=
ote:
> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:51:01 +0100 Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > > I thought this thing would be merged primarily into the networking
> > > > tree, and I don't know if they do signed tags, I usually create an
> > > > immutable branch but that should work just as fine I guess.
> > >
> > > Right, I'd expect a signed tag on the immutable branch - it's general=
ly
> > > helpful to avoid confusion about the branch actually being immutable.
> >
> > Makes sense, best to create that in the netdev tree if possible
> > I guess.
>
> I think you offered creating the branch / tag in an earlier reply,
> that's less work for me so yes please! :)

OK I fix!

Just waiting for some final reviews to trickle in.

Herve: nag me if it doesn't happen in time!

> FWIW I usually put the branches / tags in my personal k.org tree.
> I don't wanna pollute the trees for the $many people who fetch
> netdev with random tags.

Aha yeah pin control is relatively small so I just carry misc sync
tags there.

Yours,
Linus Walleij