Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:6;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Livepatching <live-patching@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
        Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@gmail.com>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Minor grammatical fixup for livepatch docs
In-Reply-To: <20231129132527.8078-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com>
References: <20231129132527.8078-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:29:35 -0700
Message-ID: <874jh4pr8w.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:

> I was prompted to write this little grammar fix series when reading
> the fix from Attreyee [1], with review comments requesting changes
> to that fix. So here's my version of the fix, with reviews from [1]
> addressed (and distinct grammar fixes splitted).

How is this helpful?  Why are you trying to push aside somebody who is
working toward a first contribution to the kernel?  This is not the way
to help somebody learn to work with the kernel community.

Attreyee, I would like to encourage you to redo your patch set based on
the feedback you have received so that we can apply it.

Thanks,

jon