Received: by 2002:a05:7412:419a:b0:f3:1519:9f41 with SMTP id i26csp4646135rdh; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:06:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHdn6o3FjWGLiHxqMH8bMBiBRycOA6xr6+uO9EzZZddmWBTBCL6hWey2pt1Dkg9BJ9idedI X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:140f:b0:3af:63ad:a610 with SMTP id w15-20020a056808140f00b003af63ada610mr26475937oiv.14.1701270366513; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:06:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1701270366; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YOTkBQNw6Dhp2xyGBbjPCVknOF6doP8L5m0tta+wEBE/RYAVOo1iXO0WVbUEFGVPFA 1h8MTFpXBgFKzTqia0ggJ9DTjSCIMZG7jxQRcNQ4ugugVbcv8QME1LhUqEkoF235gDOj ZABY0eoXGLS/XnOgLdDnLDltWTRkNQvZtw4hWjrh6kfYntH8nER2qscW0N8VjCg+HSFH v2UM9V5+WDsVwQZawWURlDPMKweU+uE/ihwrUut1IGi/8hH3zzOcw08fmf/7nqgK4X4A RddxAX+uRt5alVZYKeP8X/plUE1xHshNPLzkTGI3cae52RNXUZ0kra6/3jTTa0B3arsv ogNg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent :content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=fuBRJoZc8zYA4dA1/vrdLgmtDN9b8lrYs3XPfP7VKUY=; fh=mHtDU8egzd9Brc88qHDZzoX+wyQzoE26bQEqe53D/tM=; b=xhpoEv8S0jhzqqVbr+YIXTpvWOFX2otJzrWSBy1CCMIq+7n9akOEY7RmM3di1vuqMT k+qtVJ+Q469OLGk4FHEsrbVPDT8dnwnI4jQqKrI5dvlXrsI1Wxs0fuyIm4UPzf8FDNdQ JGac7ikQKnlk0XVjTy06l19O7tjNafBmsyifFxDz2kXG2KS5qiU0yzT2t3JNLpxDlwNl sw4p76XcMqxrxQUSRLi1ysdupANeBDcVGOJGtl8b/PYRD9v0qbmt/tD7VHjdj13B2Zaf X+BCaSOPGC1xrn2CbodSsMjmAJXDMUjfGsUFtwBLE865NXMVZnLuMgBPbRj2H7nkG3q+ /mXg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=JMY33eFM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.36 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from pete.vger.email (pete.vger.email. [23.128.96.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t25-20020a6564d9000000b005b8dd557b38si14227489pgv.14.2023.11.29.07.06.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.36 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.36; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=JMY33eFM; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.36 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by pete.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163E780B3B52; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:06:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.11 at pete.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234553AbjK2PFs (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:05:48 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34378 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234721AbjK2PFj (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:05:39 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CDF7D66; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:05:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701270345; x=1732806345; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=fuBRJoZc8zYA4dA1/vrdLgmtDN9b8lrYs3XPfP7VKUY=; b=JMY33eFMy0Rhe4IsJiRejHdrcz5bdURd+g2rKsypW/bMw5Gh1Ke/Jn12 j/LeT/+cahKQUVc+5AJ4tHDblsFxlGoIIVnswi7VMt0fKdYN0Tl3ZCZET wrdm16ju23cFbkSbxEMwO/gFj3TtWkmUqxTIUUX8dxDMFsUs1CsXOZAX8 hBKqz8ff4TzZ2W5jlOhEesL8ipvYb6yoWeikqyVIcFYSh/JNSvhRenDhQ wTCGi4G0WL35Hu5Z2gRdL9Cg+7VAO/JenixsjPboEeBBh8ztpZehSgZnE RhoYHt5dJPzelbBg402P8UNJJwDpoTm1qWnZ3N0OQLBvAjHfAwW2eByjS g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10909"; a="378207311" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,235,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="378207311" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2023 07:05:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10909"; a="892479673" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,235,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="892479673" Received: from besamani-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.113.90]) ([10.212.113.90]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Nov 2023 07:05:43 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fwd: Intel hybrid CPU scheduler always prefers E cores From: srinivas pandruvada To: Tim Chen , Ramses Cc: Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Regressions , Linux Power Management , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Yu Chen Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:05:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <01df8329-06d7-4fd1-9c7a-05296f33231e@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on pete.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (pete.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:06:04 -0800 (PST) On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 15:10 -0800, Tim Chen wrote: > On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 23:33 +0100, Ramses wrote: >=20 > > I applied the patch on top of 6.6.2, but unfortunately I see more > > or less the same behaviour as before, with single-threaded CPU- > > bound tasks running almost exclusively on E cores. > >=20 > > Ramses >=20 > I suspect that you may have other issues. I wonder if CPU priorities > are getting > assigned properly on your system. >=20 > Saw in the original bugzilla=20 > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218195 > that you don't see /proc/sys/kernel/sched_itmt_enabled which > may be a symptom of such a problem. >=20 > +Srinivas, is there something Ramses can do to help > find out if there are issues with cppc? I have updated the bugzilla with the findings. The ACPI config on this system is telling us that CPPC v2 is not supported. Current implementation depends on CPPC v2. Even in 6.4 kernel, ITMT is not enabled. Thanks, Srinivas >=20 > Tim >=20