Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934587AbXK3LiG (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:38:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759716AbXK3Lhy (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:37:54 -0500 Received: from z2.cat.iki.fi ([212.16.98.133]:58338 "EHLO z2.cat.iki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756213AbXK3Lhy (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:37:54 -0500 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:37:50 +0200 From: Matti Aarnio To: Ben Crowhurst Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C Message-ID: <20071130113750.GD6372@mea-ext.zmailer.org> References: <474EAD18.6040408@stellatravel.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <474EAD18.6040408@stellatravel.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 907 Lines: 26 On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:14:16PM +0000, Ben Crowhurst wrote: > Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development? > > regards, > BPC To my recall: Never. Some limited subset of C++ was tried, but was soon abandoned. Overall the kernel data structures are done in objectish-manner, although there are no strong type mechanisms being used. Could the kernel be written in a limited subset[*] of ObjC ? Very likely. Would it be worth the job ? Radical decrease in number of available programmers... *) Subset as enforcing the rule of not even indirectly using dynamic memory allocation, when operating in interrupt state. /Matti Aarnio - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/