Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 06:26:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 06:26:13 -0500 Received: from msp-150.man.olsztyn.pl ([213.184.31.150]:896 "EHLO msp-150.man.olsztyn.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 06:26:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 12:24:31 +0100 From: Dominik Mierzejewski To: Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: Configure.help editorial policy Message-ID: <20011227112431.GA1582@msp-150.man.olsztyn.pl> In-Reply-To: <20011223174608.A25335@thyrsus.com> <20011227091702.A8528@zapff.research.canon.com.au> <20011226233413.GA17037@msp-150.man.olsztyn.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i X-Linux-Registered-User: 134951 X-Homepage: http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~dmierzej/ X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: B546 B96A 4258 02EF 5CAB E867 3CDA 420F 7802 6AFE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, 27 December 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On December 27, 2001 12:34 am, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote: > > Although I thought there was an agreement that decimal kilobyte is kB, > > and binary kilobyte is KiB, decimal megabyte is MB, binary megabyte is MB > > and so on, wasn't there? > > Not in my book. As far as I'm concerned, somebody who tells me that one KB > of memory or disk is 1,000 bytes is a liar. When a disk manufacturer chooses > to interpret KB in such a way as to make their disk seem bigger, I just say > to myself "ok, they lied, that's what they do, they're in business and they > don't care". Now could we just ignore the self-serving doublespeak > promulgated by greedy manufacturers, and continue using KB please? > > Kilo, as in memory -> 1024 > Kilo, as in distance or weight -> 1,000 > > Difficult? > > /me wonders when the kibblebytes thread is going to end /me wonders when people will learn to read more carefully (no offense intended) :-) If you look at my post more closely, you'll see I used `kB' (that's small k and capital B) for decimal kilobyte. I would never suggest using `KB' (that's capital K and capital B) for it. I do agree that `KB' is traditionally used for binary kilobytes, but what about MB, GB and so on? These _are_ ambiguous. I am in favour of using Ki, Mi and Gi for binary quantities. -- "The Universe doesn't give you any points for doing things that are easy." -- Sheridan to Garibaldi in Babylon 5:"The Geometry of Shadows" Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/