Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.34;
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Livepatching <live-patching@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Minor grammatical fixup for livepatch docs
In-Reply-To: <a4da77c2-7a23-4988-b65a-a58c105d89a4@gmail.com>
References: <20231129132527.8078-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com>
 <ac7a90a7-4d29-059b-fbff-6b67e6f5c2d3@redhat.com>
 <a4da77c2-7a23-4988-b65a-a58c105d89a4@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:10:25 -0700
Message-ID: <87h6l4ksni.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:

> On 11/29/23 20:53, Joe Lawrence wrote:
>> On 11/29/23 08:25, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>>> I was prompted to write this little grammar fix series when reading
>>> the fix from Attreyee [1], with review comments requesting changes
>>> to that fix. So here's my version of the fix, with reviews from [1]
>>> addressed (and distinct grammar fixes splitted).
>>>
>> 
>> Typical kernel workflow would be for Attreyee to incorporate feedback
>> and post their v2 after a day or two.  From the format they posted, it
>> appears to be a first(ish) kernel contribution post.  Let's be kind and
>> patient so they we all may benefit from the practice of iterating on
>> their patch.
>> 
>
> I do this posting because I thought the OP (Attreyee) didn't respond in
> timely manner (just like random Chinese contributors like @cdjrlc.com
> and @208suo.com people).

Seriously?  The original post was on Monday, yours came less than 48
hours later.  Not only can we not expect that kind of rapid turnaround
from anybody, but we actively discourage rapid resending of patches.
Rather than dig yourself in deeper, I suggest you simply apologize to
the original poster and find something more useful to do.

Thanks,

jon