Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2023 13:33:40 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
        Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>, Huan Yang <link@vivo.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@gmail.com>,
        Yue Zhao <findns94@gmail.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: add swapiness= arg to memory.reclaim
Message-Id: <20231130133340.36140526608289898acb3ac5@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20231130153658.527556-2-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
References: <20231130153658.527556-1-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
        <20231130153658.527556-2-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 07:36:54 -0800 Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com> wrote:

> Allow proactive reclaimers to submit an additional swappiness=<val>
> argument to memory.reclaim. This overrides the global or per-memcg
> swappiness setting for that reclaim attempt.
> 
> For example:
> 
> echo "2M swappiness=0" > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory.reclaim
> 
> will perform reclaim on the rootcg with a swappiness setting of 0 (no
> swap) regardless of the vm.swappiness sysctl setting.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/swap.h |  3 ++-
>  mm/memcontrol.c      | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  mm/vmscan.c          | 13 +++++++++--

Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst is feeling unloved!

Please check whether this interface change can lead to
non-backward-compatible userspace.  If someone's script does the above
echo command, will it break on older kernels?  If so, does it matter?