Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
Message-ID: <e13a07f6-d251-4510-aa3a-3a90583bd404@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:46:35 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] selftests: cgroup: Fixes code style errors
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@gmail.com>, tj@kernel.org,
        lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, shuah@kernel.org
Cc:     cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20231106181144.117188-1-atulpant.linux@gmail.com>
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20231106181144.117188-1-atulpant.linux@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/6/23 11:11, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> Fixes following checkpatch.pl issues:
> ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
> ERROR: Macros starting with if should be enclosed by a do - while
> 
> Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c | 14 ++++++++------
>   tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_core.c   |  3 ++-
>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> index 0340d4ca8f51..e165c4a703a6 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> @@ -411,12 +411,14 @@ int dirfd_open_opath(const char *dir)
>   	return open(dir, O_DIRECTORY | O_CLOEXEC | O_NOFOLLOW | O_PATH);
>   }
>   
> -#define close_prot_errno(fd)                                                   \
> -	if (fd >= 0) {                                                         \
> -		int _e_ = errno;                                               \
> -		close(fd);                                                     \
> -		errno = _e_;                                                   \
> -	}
> +#define close_prot_errno(fd)				\
> +	do {						\
> +		if (fd >= 0) {                          \
> +			int _e_ = errno;                \
> +			close(fd);                      \
> +			errno = _e_;                    \
> +		}					\
> +	} while (0);

Did you run checkpatch on this patch? You are fixing
checkpatch errors - :)

thanks,
-- Shuah