Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S281854AbRL0OVF>; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 09:21:05 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S286302AbRL0OU4>; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 09:20:56 -0500
Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.19]:9168 "EHLO
	mailout06.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S286294AbRL0OUo>; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 09:20:44 -0500
Date: 27 Dec 2001 13:35:00 +0200
From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <8FeKi601w-B@khms.westfalen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20011223174227.NCJM25224.femail12.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>
Subject: Re: Configure.help editorial policy
X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh8 R/C435
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
In-Reply-To: <20011222045805.A24575@thyrsus.com> <20011220143247.A19377@thyrsus.com> <20011222081345.ETGO12125.femail34.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> <20011222045805.A24575@thyrsus.com> <20011223174227.NCJM25224.femail12.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>
X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail.
Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.
X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

landley@trommello.org (Rob Landley)  wrote on 23.12.01 in <20011223174227.NCJM25224.femail12.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>:

> But the binary or decimal nature of the measurement has always been
> application specific up until now, and I'm curious why that's suddenly not
> good enough anymore.

Would you want to live in a world where 1 litre milk was either more or  
less than 1 litre water?

Why, then, do you think it was *ever* "good enough"?

I certainly never thought that 1 GB disk being a different number of  
usable bits than 1 GB RAM was ever "good enough". *I* considered that to  
be plain old fraud.

> The switch appears to be based on the assumption that conformance to a
> standard issued by a bureaucratic body is arbitrarily better than
> established practice.  And yet that's not what it does, because it refuses
> to use the long form...

"Established practice" is that these prefixes are decimal. It has been  
established practice before the first electronic computer was even built.

> The patch is a can of worms, and abandoning the current domain-based
> defaults (ram is binary, network is decimal, disk needs to pick one) is not
> something I see as an improvement.  But you're the maintainer...

I see it as an unequivocal improvement, even though I don't like the  
actual choice of prefix. But then, I never liked "Exa" or "Peta" either  
...

MfG Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/