Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759091AbXLAAbm (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:31:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755564AbXLAAb3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:31:29 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:36832 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755403AbXLAAb2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:31:28 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 00:31:19 +0000 From: Al Viro To: "J.A. Magall??n" Cc: Lo??c Greni?? , Ben.Crowhurst@stellatravel.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C Message-ID: <20071201003119.GB8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <474EAD18.6040408@stellatravel.co.uk> <9b06e8d20711300229r1ed570bfi9ecbb6466fd0a0ab@mail.gmail.com> <20071201001950.11100a32@werewolf> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071201001950.11100a32@werewolf> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1736 Lines: 36 On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:19:50AM +0100, J.A. Magall??n wrote: > An vtable in C++ takes exactly the same space that the function > table pointer present in every driver nowadays... and probably > the virtual method call that C++ does itself with > > thing->do_something(with,this) > > like > push thing > push with > push this > call THING_vtable+indexof(do_something) // constants at compile time This is not what vtables are. Think for a minute - all codepaths arriving to that point in your code will pick the address to call from the same location. Either the contents of that location is constant (in which case you could bloody well call it directly in the first place) *or* it has to somehow be reassigned back and forth, according to the value of this. The former is dumb, the latter - outright insane. The contents of vtables is constant. The whole point of that thing is to deal with the situations where we _can't_ tell which derived class this ->do_something() is from; if we could tell which vtable it is at compile time, we wouldn't need to bother at all. It's a tradeoff - we pay the extra memory access (fetch vtable pointer, then fetch method from vtable) for not having to store a slew of method pointers in each instance of base class. But the extra memory access is very much there. It can be further optimized away if you have several method calls for the same object next to each other (then vtable can be picked once), but it's still done at runtime. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/