Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
        jianyong.wu@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] arch_topology: Make
 register_cpu_capacity_sysctl() tolerant to late CPUs
In-Reply-To: <E1r5R2g-00CsyV-Ss@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <ZVyz/Ve5pPu8AWoA@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <E1r5R2g-00CsyV-Ss@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 01 Dec 2023 11:45:06 +0100
Message-ID: <87v89ixkul.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 21 2023 at 13:43, Russell King wrote:
> ---
> If the offline CPUs thing is a problem for the tools that consume
> this value, we'd need to move cpu_capacity to be part of cpu.c's
> common_cpu_attr_groups. However, attempts to discuss this just end
> up in a black hole, so this is a non-starter. Thus, if this needs
> to be done, it can be done as a separate patch.

Offline CPUs have 0 capacity by definition....