Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757272AbXLAECx (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:02:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752888AbXLAECj (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:02:39 -0500 Received: from rtr.ca ([76.10.145.34]:3447 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752486AbXLAECi (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:02:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4750DCDC.8030306@rtr.ca> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:02:36 -0500 From: Mark Lord User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Andrew Morton , abelay@novell.com, lenb@kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: + restore-missing-sysfs-max_cstate-attr.patch added to -mm tree References: <200711302153.lAULrZ7n026255@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEE2FAE6A@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com> <20071130142058.816d1693.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <924EFEDD5F540B4284297C4DC59F3DEE2FAEAF@orsmsx423.amr.corp.intel.com> <4750CC78.9070105@rtr.ca> <20071130190227.1976e682@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <4750D180.6080001@rtr.ca> <20071130191816.3e744205@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <4750D585.1030200@rtr.ca> <4750D899.4020905@rtr.ca> In-Reply-To: <4750D899.4020905@rtr.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1417 Lines: 43 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:44:25 -0500 > Mark Lord wrote: >>> all you need to do in your kernel module is call >>> >>> add_latency_constraint("mark_wants_his_mouse", 5); >> Okay, and how to change it back again? (thanks) > > > sorry I misremember it's called > set_acceptable_latency("mark", 5); > > and to remove the constraint again you just do > > remove_acceptable_latency("mark"); > > (and there's modify_ too to change existing) > >> Then why not have a sysfs entry for scripts to write tsoro >> to trigger the exact same end result? :) > > that's what is in current -mm pretty much > well not sysfs, but it goes via a file descriptor > (so that if the process that sets the contraint dies, the latency > requirement can be given up automatically) ... But doesn't that approach also make it nearly impossible to script ???? Having to hack source for any apps that one wants to use it on sounds rather barbaric.. (sure I *can* still script it, with background tasksand wait and .. but that's getting rather complex again). Meanwhile.. I'll now cook up a module to try the set/remove_acceptable_latency thing. Thanks - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/