Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.31 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.31;
Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2023 12:44:04 +0000
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap: DTPM: Fix the missing cpufreq_cpu_put() calls
Message-ID: <2023120139-staging-sprang-7e77@gregkh>
References: <20231201123205.1996790-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231201123205.1996790-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 12:32:05PM +0000, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> The policy returned by cpufreq_cpu_get() has to be released with
> the help of cpufreq_cpu_put() to balance its kobject reference counter
> properly.
> 
> Add the missing calls to cpufreq_cpu_put() in the code.
> 
> Fixes: 0aea2e4ec2a2 ("powercap/dtpm_cpu: Reset per_cpu variable in the release function")
> Fixes: 0e8f68d7f048 ("powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+

But the Fixes: tags are for commits that are only in 5.12 and newer, how
can this be relevant for 5.10?

thanks,

greg k-h