Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4;
Date:   Fri, 1 Dec 2023 15:03:45 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To:     Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: pxrc - simplify mutex handling with guard macro
Message-ID: <ZWnnwfzqHlfjSqFK@hovoldconsulting.com>
References: <20231201-pxrc-guard-v1-1-38937e657368@gmail.com>
 <ZWnfsjIukIbAvQ-l@hovoldconsulting.com>
 <ZWnkFjFeEV7y9tUr@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RvzoCxPxgrfnamj4"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZWnkFjFeEV7y9tUr@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


--RvzoCxPxgrfnamj4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 02:48:06PM +0100, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 02:29:22PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:

> > Eh, this looks obviously broken. Did you not test this before
> > submitting? I assume lockdep would complain loudly too.
>=20
> Sorry, it is more that I'm not in the habit of using b4 for submitting
> patches yet, so things got wrong.
> There is a v2 out there.

Ah, good, you noticed yourself.

Johan

--RvzoCxPxgrfnamj4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHQEABYIAB0WIQQHbPq+cpGvN/peuzMLxc3C7H1lCAUCZWnnvQAKCRALxc3C7H1l
CF+ZAPUQtJxNLf02XShjHdKS6NdhEE7tjiBvw9T/Jojh4lZ7AQCdctKkAWxZaw8n
0jC/CUrBTqsPcu0LBukxRPzPePx3Ag==
=8Tt0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RvzoCxPxgrfnamj4--