Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755253AbXLBBRJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:17:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753537AbXLBBQy (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:16:54 -0500 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:58149 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753406AbXLBBQx (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:16:53 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Jiri Slaby Cc: Mark Lord , Arjan van de Ven , Stephen Hemminger , Alan Cox , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Greg KH , Tejun Heo , Linux Containers , netdev@vger.kernel.org, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, kay.sievers@vrfy.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Herbert Xu , David Miller , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL" References: <47515D39.9030900@rtr.ca> <20071201111736.297dd99a@freepuppy.rosehill> <20071201192341.6750fbdb@the-village.bc.nu> <20071201113815.5df0960a@freepuppy.rosehill> <4751C238.6010609@rtr.ca> <20071201122926.5c887588@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <4751DC3C.1050606@rtr.ca> <4751ED1A.6020400@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:14:38 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4751ED1A.6020400@gmail.com> (Jiri Slaby's message of "Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:24:10 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1132 Lines: 34 Jiri Slaby writes: > On 12/02/2007 12:13 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Mark Lord writes: >>> Fine. But all of them want to call sk_alloc(), >> >> network drivers should be calling sk_alloc less then they should >> call dev_get_by_XXXX. Only protocols call sk_alloc. >> >>> and many want to do register_netdev(). >> >> I haven't even touched register_netdev. >> >>> So what should they be using there ? >> >> What are you having problems with? >> >> It is hard to answer specific questions without a context. > > VMware vmnet. With a quick glance in that direction it appears to the result of a design bug in vmnet that they call sk_alloc at all, and someone seems to have found a work around in vmnet for this situation. My gut feel is that vmware should just use tun or tap (whichever is the appropriate one), and be done with it. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/