Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231128084236.157152-1-wenst@chromium.org> <20231128084236.157152-2-wenst@chromium.org>
 <CAD=FV=V_v11eZ6+3gUwOvdWGNM9owG7zCK5EiezTY7RJ3eaEMw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=V_v11eZ6+3gUwOvdWGNM9owG7zCK5EiezTY7RJ3eaEMw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2023 14:28:20 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5GiwgF4CJBPT7JucV8qEMY0jLAvT3TqRzvLjCKcVMZ0Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] of: dynamic: Add of_changeset_update_prop_string
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
        Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
        chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        linus.walleij@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hdegoede@redhat.com,
        james.clark@arm.com, james@equiv.tech, keescook@chromium.org,
        rafael@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 9:01=E2=80=AFAM Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org=
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 12:45=E2=80=AFAM Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org=
> wrote:
> >
> > @@ -1039,3 +1039,50 @@ int of_changeset_add_prop_u32_array(struct of_ch=
angeset *ocs,
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_changeset_add_prop_u32_array);
> > +
> > +static int of_changeset_update_prop_helper(struct of_changeset *ocs,
> > +                                          struct device_node *np,
> > +                                          const struct property *pp)
> > +{
> > +       struct property *new_pp;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       new_pp =3D __of_prop_dup(pp, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       if (!new_pp)
> > +               return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +       ret =3D of_changeset_update_property(ocs, np, new_pp);
> > +       if (ret) {
> > +               kfree(new_pp->name);
> > +               kfree(new_pp->value);
> > +               kfree(new_pp);
>
> Given that this is the 3rd copy of the freeing logic, does it make
> sense to make __of_prop_free() that's documented to free what was
> returned by __of_prop_dupe()?

Makes sense.  There's also one in property_list_free(). I'll add a patch
for it.

ChenYu