Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 11:31:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 11:31:33 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:25611 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 11:31:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:30:53 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Alan Cox Cc: Dana Lacoste , "'Eyal Sohya'" , Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > All in all, if such a system is ever going to exist, it > > needs to _reduce_ the amount of work the kernel maintainers > > need to do, otherwise it'll never get used. > > Tridge wrote the system you describe, several years ago. Its called > jitterbug but it doesnt help because Linus wont use it I don't care about Linus, he drops so many bugfixes his kernel have done nothing but suck rocks since the 2.1 era. This system could be useful for people who _are_ maintainers, however. regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/