Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
Date:   Mon, 4 Dec 2023 15:24:33 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] gpiolib: use gpiochip_dup_line_label() in
 for_each helpers
Message-ID: <ZW3TEQok8Ri-epw8@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20231204093509.19225-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <20231204093509.19225-10-brgl@bgdev.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231204093509.19225-10-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> Rework for_each_requested_gpio_in_range() to use the new helper to
> retrieve a dynamically allocated copy of the descriptor label and free
> it at the end of each iteration. We need to leverage the CLASS()'
> destructor to make sure that the label is freed even when breaking out
> of the loop.

...

> -		if ((label = gpiochip_is_requested(chip, base + i)) == NULL) {} else

I see, but...

> +		if ((*_data.label =							\
> +			gpiochip_dup_line_label(_chip, _base + *_data.i)) == NULL) {}	\

...can we drop this NULL check by using !(...) notation?


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko