Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1;
From:   "Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries" <jorge@foundries.io>
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2023 17:10:02 +0100
To:     "Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries" <jorge@foundries.io>
Cc:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>,
        "adrian.hunter@intel.com" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        "ulf.hansson@linaro.org" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        "christian.loehle@arm.com" <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
        "jinpu.wang@ionos.com" <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>,
        "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        "beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        "yibin.ding@unisoc.com" <yibin.ding@unisoc.com>,
        "victor.shih@genesyslogic.com.tw" <victor.shih@genesyslogic.com.tw>,
        "asuk4.q@gmail.com" <asuk4.q@gmail.com>,
        "hkallweit1@gmail.com" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        "yangyingliang@huawei.com" <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
        "yebin10@huawei.com" <yebin10@huawei.com>,
        "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: rpmb: do not force a retune before RPMB switch
Message-ID: <ZW9LWrlYa2+lUcVc@trax>
References: <20231204150111.3320071-1-jorge@foundries.io>
 <DM6PR04MB657532850510D64BA7D62297FC86A@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <ZW4W6aZq+0DCmVTi@trax>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZW4W6aZq+0DCmVTi@trax>
Precedence: bulk

On 04/12/23 19:14:01, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries wrote:
> On 04/12/23 17:58:45, Avri Altman wrote:
> > >
> > > Requesting a retune before switching to the RPMB partition has been
> > > observed to cause CRC errors on the RPMB reads (-EILSEQ).
> > >
> > > Since RPMB reads can not be retried, the clients would be directly affected by
> > > the errors.
> > >
> > > This commit disables the request prior to RPMB switching while allowing the
> > > pause interface to still request a retune before the pause for other use cases.
> > >
> > > This was verified with the sdhci-of-arasan driver (ZynqMP) configured for
> > > HS200 using two separate eMMC cards (DG4064 and 064GB2). In both cases,
> > > the error was easy to reproduce triggering every few tenths of reads.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge@foundries.io>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 2 +-
> > >  drivers/mmc/core/host.c  | 7 ++++---
> > >  drivers/mmc/core/host.h  | 2 +-
> > >  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c index
> > > f9a5cffa64b1..1d69078ad9b2 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> > > @@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_part_switch_pre(struct mmc_card
> > > *card,
> > >                         if (ret)
> > >                                 return ret;
> > >                 }
> > > -               mmc_retune_pause(card->host);
> > > +               mmc_retune_pause(card->host, false);
> > >         }
> > >
> > >         return ret;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c index
> > > 096093f7be00..a9b95aaa2235 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
> > > @@ -119,13 +119,14 @@ void mmc_retune_enable(struct mmc_host *host)
> > >
> > >  /*
> > >   * Pause re-tuning for a small set of operations.  The pause begins after the
> > > - * next command and after first doing re-tuning.
> > > + * next command and, if retune is set, after first doing re-tuning.
> > >   */
> > > -void mmc_retune_pause(struct mmc_host *host)
> > > +void mmc_retune_pause(struct mmc_host *host, bool retune)
> > >  {
> > Since mmc_blk_part_switch_pre is the only caller of mmc_retune_pause,
> > How about just move those lines into it?
>
> +1 from me
>
> I wasnt sure if there was some other plan for mmc_retune_pause in the
> future hence why I didnt remove it and extended it instead.
>
> Should I wait for Adrian's confirmation or just go ahead?.

just making sure this is not falling through the cracks.