Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753761AbXLCOHn (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:07:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751454AbXLCOHg (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:07:36 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.189]:25422 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750727AbXLCOHf (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:07:35 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=el6wfe8HS/1IfMbSzjGY8XsVkNGCJ+1SkRbpXbJ7O8JiNklvj4SRpxURsJ3z9MX4viJbIB2LUj8+fNRRs1fNdDBd7WaRx7R90WmTn4hGIvDURwMAwaB04HfPUtKCgjXyogtxLSO2mLxZ/KIYu4suWN4V0wDPLYmGpGUkWpE9Yy8= Message-ID: <84144f020712030607v79ebf1e8w8c8b14d2647f1deb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:07:33 +0200 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Adrian Bunk" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add EXPORT_SYMBOL(ksize); Cc: "Tetsuo Handa" , acme@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20071203135700.GR15974@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200712021743.GBH12983.FHOFVJOMFLOStQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20071202134841.GI15974@stusta.de> <200712030634.CBJ18798.OVFQJSFFOHMtLO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20071202214629.GA15034@ghostprotocols.net> <200712032041.ABB90643.SOFVQFtMHFLOOJ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20071203135700.GR15974@stusta.de> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 125e67fe6f538cb0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 762 Lines: 18 Hi, On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:41:44PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > We couldn't know how much memory was allocated by kmalloc() in 2.4 era, and we can know it 2.6 era. > > But are we going back to 2.4 era for out-of-tree kernel modules? On Dec 3, 2007 3:57 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The interesting fact is that there are zero in-kernel modules using it. Yeah, and now that we have krealloc() I don't expect that many callers actually need ksize() either. Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/