Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 12:55:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 12:55:38 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:30480 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 12:55:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 18:55:20 +0100 (CET) From: Dave Jones To: Richard Gooch Cc: Russell King , Alan Cox , Rik van Riel , Dana Lacoste , "'Eyal Sohya'" , Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking In-Reply-To: <200112271738.fBRHcSd30844@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Richard Gooch wrote: > So you just do what Linus does: delete those questions without > replying. No matter what system you use, if you want to avoid an > overflowing mailbox, you either have to silently drop patches, and/or > silently drop questions/requests/begging letters. There isn't really > much difference between the two. just a sidenote: Patches cc'd to linux-kernel instead of just to Alan/Marcelo/Linus are also far more likely to be 'rediscovered' sometime, bringing up "why wasn't this merged?" mails when perhaps the time is better for $maintainer to merge. I spent post-xmas-lunch going through backlogged l-k mails, and found a bunch of patches that fix small problems that never got merged. (These bits ended up in -dj6, and what will be -dj7 btw, and will get pushed to the relevant people soon.) Note however, xmas comes but once a year, so someone else can pick up the silently ignored stuff next time 8-) Dave. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/