Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:00:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:00:08 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:6854 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 12:59:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 10:59:55 -0700 Message-Id: <200112271759.fBRHxtH31437@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Alan Cox Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King), riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel), dana.lacoste@peregrine.com (Dana Lacoste), linuz_kernel_q@hotmail.com ('Eyal Sohya'), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <200112271738.fBRHcSd30844@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox writes: > > So you just do what Linus does: delete those questions without > > replying. No matter what system you use, if you want to avoid an > > overflowing mailbox, you either have to silently drop patches, and/or > > silently drop questions/requests/begging letters. There isn't really > > much difference between the two. > > The problem is that if Linus is simply ignoring you then you don't > know why, A simple "Clean up the ifdefs" would make a lot of > difference. If someone sent a patch its because they hit something > they felt needed fixing and as far as they can tell fixed it. If you > want them to go elsewhere ignore them, but its much more useful to > give them at least brief answers to actual patch files Oh, don't get me wrong. I agree completely. A short two minute reply is not that much to ask for, and I wish Linus would be more responsive. And apply bugfix patches (I've been trying for weeks to get him to apply my patches to fix a bunch of Oopses:-(). But years of observations tells me that Linus likes the way he does things and doesn't care if others don't like it. I don't expect to see much change there. But the point I was making was that a patch management system doesn't really make things harder to drop/ignore. If you're comfortable with ignoring patches (which take *work* to construct), then it's no stretch to ignore questions (which often take little work to send). Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/