Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:04:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:04:01 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:9414 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:03:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 11:04:01 -0700 Message-Id: <200112271804.fBRI41m31583@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Dave Jones Cc: Russell King , Alan Cox , Rik van Riel , Dana Lacoste , "'Eyal Sohya'" , Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <200112271738.fBRHcSd30844@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Jones writes: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Richard Gooch wrote: > > > So you just do what Linus does: delete those questions without > > replying. No matter what system you use, if you want to avoid an > > overflowing mailbox, you either have to silently drop patches, and/or > > silently drop questions/requests/begging letters. There isn't really > > much difference between the two. > > just a sidenote: > Patches cc'd to linux-kernel instead of just to Alan/Marcelo/Linus are > also far more likely to be 'rediscovered' sometime, bringing up > "why wasn't this merged?" mails when perhaps the time is better for > $maintainer to merge. Sure, although I post to l-k a URL and ChangeLog, and separately send to Linus/Marcelo the actual patch. People grumble when I send kiB's (or even kB's :-) to the list. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/