Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2023 11:26:29 +0100
From:   Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
        "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 19/32] timers: add_timer_on(): Make sure TIMER_PINNED
 flag is set
Message-ID: <20231206102629.auU8wCDH@linutronix.de>
References: <20231201092654.34614-1-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
 <20231201092654.34614-20-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
 <20231205182924.SFCmSKXe@linutronix.de>
 <87o7f3ejq2.fsf@somnus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87o7f3ejq2.fsf@somnus>
Precedence: bulk

On 2023-12-06 10:57:57 [+0100], Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> writes:
> 
> > On 2023-12-01 10:26:41 [+0100], Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> >> When adding a timer to the timer wheel using add_timer_on(), it is an
> >> implicitly pinned timer. With the timer pull at expiry time model in place,
> >> TIMER_PINNED flag is required to make sure timers end up in proper base.
> >> 
> >> Add TIMER_PINNED flag unconditionally when add_timer_on() is executed.
> >
> > This is odd. I have some vague memory that this was already the case.
> > Otherwise all add_timer_on() users without TIMER_PINNED may get it wrong
> > due to optimisation.
> 
> Which optimisation are you talking about? Are you talking about the
> heuristic for finding the best CPU in get_target_base()? This heuristic
> is not used for add_timer_on().

Yes, true. And nobody probably mixes add_timer_on() and mod_timer().

> Does this makes it a little more clear, why the change is required and
> why it is also valid right now?

Yes, all good. Thanks.

> Thanks,
> 
> 	Anna-Maria

Sebastian