Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S286419AbRL0SHI>; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:07:08 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S286415AbRL0SGv>; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:06:51 -0500
Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:31761 "HELO Cantor.suse.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S286411AbRL0SGg>;
	Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:06:36 -0500
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:06:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
To: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
        Dana Lacoste <dana.lacoste@peregrine.com>,
        "'Eyal Sohya'" <linuz_kernel_q@hotmail.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking
In-Reply-To: <200112271804.fBRI41m31583@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112271905010.15706-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Richard Gooch wrote:

> Sure, although I post to l-k a URL and ChangeLog, and separately send
> to Linus/Marcelo the actual patch. People grumble when I send kiB's
> (or even kB's :-) to the list.

Good enough. (In fact, preferable imo, as long as the patch stays
at the url if still relevant/unapplied).

The "I sent a patch n times to linus without ccing l-k and he didn't
apply it" case however, is a lost one imo.

Dave.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/