Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:6;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Wed, 06 Dec 2023 14:57:20 +0100
From:   Florian Eckert <fe@dev.tdt.de>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc:     Eckert.Florian@googlemail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        jirislaby@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz, kabel@kernel.org,
        u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, m.brock@vanmierlo.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v8 0/6] ledtrig-tty: add additional tty state evaluation
In-Reply-To: <20231206134719.GF3375667@google.com>
References: <20231109085038.371977-1-fe@dev.tdt.de>
 <170142723852.3350831.6373465907279189004.b4-ty@kernel.org>
 <8acd2694429af4f7205db7d7bb39eab6@dev.tdt.de>
 <20231206134719.GF3375667@google.com>
Message-ID: <e69d088b1aedfef330eace35699670c6@dev.tdt.de>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.17
Precedence: bulk


On 2023-12-06 14:47, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2023, Florian Eckert wrote:
>> On 2023-12-01 11:40, Lee Jones wrote:

>> > Applied, thanks!
>> >
>> > [1/6] tty: add new helper function tty_get_tiocm
>> >       commit: 5d11a4709f552fa139c2439fead05daeb064a6f4
>> > [2/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: free allocated ttyname buffer on deactivate
>> >       (no commit info)
>> > [3/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: change logging if get icount failed
>> >       (no commit info)
>> > [4/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: replace mutex with completion
>> >       (no commit info)
>> > [5/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: make rx tx activitate configurable
>> >       (no commit info)
>> > [6/6] leds: ledtrig-tty: add additional line state evaluation
>> >       (no commit info)
>> 
>> I think that was a mistake? Patchset v9 is the correct patchset [1]?
>> 
>> Thanks for applying v9 [1]
> 
> It's automated.  Not sure what happened now.
> 
> Please check to ensure the correct set was applied.

I have checked that v9 is appled to the branch for-leds-next [1].
I can confirm that v9 patchset is applied there.

Thanks

Best regards

Florian

Links:
[1] 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/leds.git/log/?h=for-leds-next