Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751880AbXLDASn (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:18:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750967AbXLDASf (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:18:35 -0500 Received: from smtp110.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.220]:28484 "HELO smtp110.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750740AbXLDASf (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:18:35 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=H+wEpk2g0VKLUQ/O7+g9LeRUVXig4N8xWUHRZdAWIyCsjqovS6m/DVAOljgLeyS+mPa1ORjOMGy7xvOi55nCrNiL/uRyEbvgtZDSlfH9+OMzm1g6OdalQrSUHHBomZNU2RIcXg9jq90Xo68NkUz0mz83CbDBT3LSvQ11BcwLVlw= ; X-YMail-OSG: DXWFOm8VM1n.P65yf4i.yTqUUqp8asUlnEhwPi.AfEjzdXkV9pWyw5d91oJOKU9T10eRXBKYDw-- From: Nick Piggin To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: sched_yield: delete sysctl_sched_compat_yield Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:18:24 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Mark Lord , Chris Friesen , davids@webmaster.com, "Zhang, Yanmin" , Arjan van de Ven , Andrew Morton , LKML References: <475480AF.2010307@rtr.ca> <20071203223353.GA20362@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20071203223353.GA20362@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200712041118.25414.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1298 Lines: 28 On Tuesday 04 December 2007 09:33, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mark Lord wrote: > >> heh, thanks :) For which workload does it make the biggest difference > >> for you? (and compared to what other scheduler you used before? > >> 2.6.22?) > > > > .. > > > > Heh.. I'm just a very unsophisticated desktop user, and I like it when > > Thunderbird and Firefox are unaffected by the "make -j3" kernel builds > > that are often running in another window. BIG difference there. > > > > And on the cool side, the Swarm game (swarm.swf) is a great example of > > something that used to get jerky really fast whenever anything else > > was running, and now it really doesn't seem to be affected by > > anything. (I don't really play computer games, but this one is has a > > very retro feel..). > > nice! Do you feel any difference between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc for these > workloads? (if you've tried .24 already) And also, I wonder what the average timeslice and number of context switches is between 2.6.22 and 2.6.23-4. Would be interesting to see. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/