Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:26:49 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
       Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 IOAPIC: de-fang IRQ compression
Message-ID: <20071204122649.GB27286@elte.hu>
References: <200711280121.18376.lenb@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200711280121.18376.lenb@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1266
Lines: 30


* Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> wrote:

>     So while the irq compression code on i386 should really
>     be deleted -- even before merging the x86_64 irq-overhaul,
>     this patch simply disables it on all high volume systems
>     to avoid problems #1 and #2 on most all i386 systems.
>     
>     A large system with pin numbers >=64 will still have compression
>     to conserve limited IRQ numbers for sparse IOAPICS.  However,
>     the vast majority of the planet, those with only pin numbers < 64
>     will use an identity GSI -> IRQ mapping.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

thanks for the patch and the extensive description. I've applied this to 
x86.git. Do you agree that this has no urgency for v2.6.24 and is thus 
v2.6.25 material?

would you be interested in doing a follow-up patch as well that just 
yanks all of the irq compression code? That would keep things nicely 
bisectable and testable - the second, larger patch would be a NOP in 
theory on most systems.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/