Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754090AbXLDMyj (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 07:54:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752838AbXLDMyb (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 07:54:31 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:35480 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752745AbXLDMyb (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2007 07:54:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:54:08 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Kumar Gala Cc: mingo@redhat.com, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: why is kmap_prot not always a define? Message-ID: <20071204125408.GC31590@elte.hu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.1 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.1 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.1 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0154] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 450 Lines: 14 * Kumar Gala wrote: > Is there some reason why kmap_prot isn't just a #define on all archs? none that i can remember - why do you ask? Do you have some cleanup idea? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/