Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:16:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:16:49 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:3857 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:16:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:16:10 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > OK, I'll setup something to automatically send you patches > > as long as they're not applied, don't get any reaction and > > still apply cleanly. > > No. > > Did you read the part about "maintainership" at all? Of course the patch will be updated when needed, but I still have a few 6-month old patches lying around that still work as expected and don't need any change. I see absolutely no reason to not automate the resending of these patches, once they need maintenance again I'll maintain them. > I ignore automatic emails, the same way I ignore spam. Automating > patch-sending is _not_ maintainership. Silently dropping bugfixes on the floor is not maintainership, either. regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/