Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.36 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.36;
Message-ID: <f6fc246f-4f57-4340-a967-396047e2924d@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:05:33 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: md raid6 oops in 6.6.4 stable
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
        Genes Lists <lists@sapience.com>, snitzer@kernel.org,
        song@kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
        mpatocka@redhat.com, heinzm@redhat.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc:     Bhanu Victor DiCara <00bvd0+linux@gmail.com>,
        Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>,
        Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <6e6816dd-2ec5-4bca-9558-60cfde46ef8c@sapience.com>
 <ZXHJEkwIJ5zKTMjV@archie.me>
 <e2d47b6c-3420-4785-8e04-e5f217d09a46@leemhuis.info>
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e2d47b6c-3420-4785-8e04-e5f217d09a46@leemhuis.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 12/7/23 20:58, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 07.12.23 14:30, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 08:10:04AM -0500, Genes Lists wrote:
>>> I have not had chance to git bisect this but since it happened in stable I
>>> thought it was important to share sooner than later.
>>>
>>> One possibly relevant commit between 6.6.3 and 6.6.4 could be:
>>>
>>>   commit 2c975b0b8b11f1ffb1ed538609e2c89d8abf800e
>>>   Author: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
>>>   Date:   Fri Nov 17 15:56:30 2023 -0800
>>>
>>>     md: fix bi_status reporting in md_end_clone_io
>>>
>>> log attached shows page_fault_oops.
>>> Machine was up for 3 days before crash happened.
>>
>> Can you confirm that culprit by bisection?
> 
> Bagas, I know you are trying to help, but sorry, I'd say this is not
> helpful at all -- any maybe even harmful.
> 
> From the quoted texts it's pretty clear that the reporter knows that a
> bisection would be helpful, but currently is unable to perform one --
> and even states reasons for reporting it without having it bisected. So
> your message afaics doesn't bring anything new to the table; and I might
> be wrong with that, but I fear some people in a situation like this
> might even be offended by a reply like that, as it states something
> already obvious.
> 

Oops, I didn't fully understand the context. Thanks anyway.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara