Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2023 10:07:54 +0100
From:   Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Ray <ian.ray@ge.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        kernel@collabora.com, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/2] Fix imx53-ppd UART configuration
Message-ID: <20231208090754.fn3bddlum3t7kakn@pengutronix.de>
References: <20210430175038.103226-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rhppgyqd7t7ywrip"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210430175038.103226-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Precedence: bulk


--rhppgyqd7t7ywrip
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[Cc +=3D dt maintainers]

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:50:36PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> IMHO PATCHv4 was better, but in the end I don't have strong feelings
> about this. Btw. I think this patchset is a good demonstration of
> frustrating upstream kernel development can be considering PATCHv5
> is basically the same as PATCHv1. Thanks for making us go in
> circles :(

I still like v4 better than v1/v5. I'm sorry for the frustration this
created on your side.=20

I'd ask Greg to reconsider given that dt is less flexible than a sysfs
knob and otherwise shares all downsides of sysfs (people don't want to
have to tune that, so a useful default for most cases is important; you
have to consult documentation to understand how to tune it).

Best regards
Uwe

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

--rhppgyqd7t7ywrip
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmVy3OkACgkQj4D7WH0S
/k6ZMAf/bJ6Do/+Ap+RHZnbjCMELrpCx+6h7f7pnGXD8hqftIz+Ysir0aF+kBCFH
GdEtc/ct9nQi9SYsT1u18+UFG/roD/WoNLQ72Elr46CopNsRnHBNKmDA/VgS0xW/
um8qYbF+aEFkyZgS2NKT0bzkjpMSDnNYu2IZQr2keCLmQQAbLOp8bELi3oX2JuJT
fjHusoMT3abd0ZQm3kY+CUVJ+ROkUl/8yi7TZTnLN0NTH8JSudB1euakrEV0bhOc
KW6GMif04RK75PWPUunvlrxyPD2Pje2I9G3K6vsp8mXDIffeI5GyhH51wD3YKOe7
mIaJ6GBw0+ASbVw7fErVyzxIf5SzdQ==
=BHUP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rhppgyqd7t7ywrip--