Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:6;
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2023 18:40:20 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Petr =?utf-8?B?VGVzYcWZw61r?= <petr@tesarici.cz>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        "open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Wangkefeng <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
        Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>,
        Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@huawei-partners.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] swiotlb: reduce area lock contention for
 non-primary IO TLB pools
Message-ID: <20231211174020.GA28041@lst.de>
References: <20231201121352.195-1-petrtesarik@huaweicloud.com> <20231211140111.5dbb74c0@meshulam.tesarici.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20231211140111.5dbb74c0@meshulam.tesarici.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:01:11PM +0100, Petr Tesařík wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> just a friendly ping about the following patch. Does it need more time
> to review, or has it gone lost?

I've just been a bit too busy.  I'll do a run on dma-related things
this week.