Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
From:   Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Md. Haris Iqbal" <haris.iqbal@ionos.com>,
        Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org>,
        Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Subject: [PATCH v3 25/35] RDMA/rtrs: optimize __rtrs_get_permit() by using find_and_set_bit_lock()
Date:   Mon, 11 Dec 2023 18:27:39 -0800
Message-Id: <20231212022749.625238-26-yury.norov@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231212022749.625238-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
References: <20231212022749.625238-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

The function opencodes find_and_set_bit_lock() with a while-loop polling
on test_and_set_bit_lock(). Use the dedicated function instead.

Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c | 15 +++------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
index 7f3167ce2972..9f1c612df392 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
@@ -72,18 +72,9 @@ __rtrs_get_permit(struct rtrs_clt_sess *clt, enum rtrs_clt_con_type con_type)
 	struct rtrs_permit *permit;
 	int bit;
 
-	/*
-	 * Adapted from null_blk get_tag(). Callers from different cpus may
-	 * grab the same bit, since find_first_zero_bit is not atomic.
-	 * But then the test_and_set_bit_lock will fail for all the
-	 * callers but one, so that they will loop again.
-	 * This way an explicit spinlock is not required.
-	 */
-	do {
-		bit = find_first_zero_bit(clt->permits_map, max_depth);
-		if (bit >= max_depth)
-			return NULL;
-	} while (test_and_set_bit_lock(bit, clt->permits_map));
+	bit = find_and_set_bit_lock(clt->permits_map, max_depth);
+	if (bit >= max_depth)
+		return NULL;
 
 	permit = get_permit(clt, bit);
 	WARN_ON(permit->mem_id != bit);
-- 
2.40.1