Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
From:   Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2023 13:35:26 +0100
To:     Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
        Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: Provide a boot time parameter to control lazy RCU
Message-ID: <ZXhTjrTqZvMTXKtK@pc636>
References: <20231203011252.233748-1-qyousef@layalina.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231203011252.233748-1-qyousef@layalina.io>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 01:12:52AM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> To allow more flexible arrangements while still provide a single kernel
> for distros, provide a boot time parameter to enable/disable lazy RCU.
> 
> Specify:
> 
> 	rcutree.enable_rcu_lazy=[y|1|n|0]
> 
> Which also requires
> 
> 	rcu_nocbs=all
> 
> at boot time to enable/disable lazy RCU.
> 
> To disable it by default at build time when CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y, the new
> CONFIG_RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF can be used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@layalina.io>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 
> 	* Use module_param() instead of module_param_cb()
> 	* Add new CONFIG_RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF to force default off.
> 	* Remove unnecessary READ_ONCE()
> 
> Tested on qemu only this time with various config/boot configuration to ensure
> expected values are in sysfs.
> 
> Did a bunch of build tests against various configs/archs.
> 
>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |  5 +++++
>  kernel/rcu/Kconfig                              | 13 +++++++++++++
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c                               |  7 ++++++-
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 65731b060e3f..2f0386a12aa7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -5021,6 +5021,11 @@
>  			this kernel boot parameter, forcibly setting it
>  			to zero.
>  
> +	rcutree.enable_rcu_lazy= [KNL]
> +			To save power, batch RCU callbacks and flush after
> +			delay, memory pressure or callback list growing too
> +			big.
> +
>  	rcuscale.gp_async= [KNL]
>  			Measure performance of asynchronous
>  			grace-period primitives such as call_rcu().
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> index bdd7eadb33d8..e7d2dd267593 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> @@ -314,6 +314,19 @@ config RCU_LAZY
>  	  To save power, batch RCU callbacks and flush after delay, memory
>  	  pressure, or callback list growing too big.
>  
> +	  Requires rcu_nocbs=all to be set.
> +
> +	  Use rcutree.enable_rcu_lazy=0 to turn it off at boot time.
> +
> +config RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF
> +	bool "Turn RCU lazy invocation off by default"
> +	depends on RCU_LAZY
> +	default n
> +	help
> +	  Allows building the kernel with CONFIG_RCU_LAZY=y yet keep it default
> +	  off. Boot time param rcutree.enable_rcu_lazy=1 can be used to switch
> +	  it back on.
> +
>  config RCU_DOUBLE_CHECK_CB_TIME
>  	bool "RCU callback-batch backup time check"
>  	depends on RCU_EXPERT
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 3ac3c846105f..8b7675624815 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2719,6 +2719,9 @@ __call_rcu_common(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func, bool lazy_in)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
> +static bool enable_rcu_lazy __read_mostly = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF);
> +module_param(enable_rcu_lazy, bool, 0444);
> +
>  /**
>   * call_rcu_hurry() - Queue RCU callback for invocation after grace period, and
>   * flush all lazy callbacks (including the new one) to the main ->cblist while
> @@ -2744,6 +2747,8 @@ void call_rcu_hurry(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
>  	__call_rcu_common(head, func, false);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_hurry);
> +#else
> +#define enable_rcu_lazy		false
>  #endif
>  
>  /**
> @@ -2792,7 +2797,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_hurry);
>   */
>  void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
>  {
> -	__call_rcu_common(head, func, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_LAZY));
> +	__call_rcu_common(head, func, enable_rcu_lazy);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu);
>  
I think, it makes sense. Especially for devices/systems where it is hard
to recompile the kernel and deploy it. For example, Google and GKI approach.

Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki