Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2023 14:27:56 +0100
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To:     Gianfranco Dutka <gianfranco.dutka@arista.com>
Cc:     Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.com,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
        "Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Modifying isolcpus, nohz_full, and rcu_nocb kernel parameters at
 runtime
Message-ID: <ZXhf3A0FNjFZaZGK@lothringen>
References: <76587DD3-2A77-41A3-9807-6AEE4398EBA6@arista.com>
 <CAKfTPtAkhfAhFouCGTy7m4swCeeEsu1VdWEX_ahOVDq1U594Dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZXJKAnrRjBUmKx1V@slm.duckdns.org>
 <d46834f4-a490-4a4a-9e95-cca4a6316570@redhat.com>
 <25E6E1E4-DC16-490E-B907-A3236FB9317A@arista.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <25E6E1E4-DC16-490E-B907-A3236FB9317A@arista.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 09:18:53AM -0500, Gianfranco Dutka wrote:
> 
> > The isolcpus, nohz_full and rcu_nocbs are boot-time kernel parameters. I am in the process of improving dynamic CPU isolation at runtime. Right now, we are able to do isolcpus=domain with the isolated cpuset partition functionality. Other aspects of CPU isolation are being looked at with the goal of reducing the gap of what one can do at boot time versus what can be done at run time. It will certain take time to reach that goal.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Longman
> > 
> 
> Thank you Waiman for the response. It would seem that getting similar
> functionality through cgroups/cpusets is the only option at the moment. Is it
> completely out of the question to possibly patch the kernel to modify these
> parameters at runtime? Or would that entail a significant change that might
> not be so trivial to accomplish? For instance, the solution wouldn’t be as
> simple as patching the kernel to make these writeable and then calling the
> same functions which run at boot-time when these parameters are originally
> written?

As for nohz_full (which implies rcu_nocb), it's certainly possible to make it
tunable at runtime via cpusets. If people really want it, I'm willing to help.

Thanks.