Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1;
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2023 09:42:52 -0800
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
        Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>,
        Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        Christian =?utf-8?B?S8O2bmln?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Pan Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
        linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amd/display: Support DRM_AMD_DC_FP on RISC-V
Message-ID: <20231212174252.ycztjhgyhtcrffur@treble>
References: <20231122030621.3759313-1-samuel.holland@sifive.com>
 <20231122030621.3759313-4-samuel.holland@sifive.com>
 <ZV2+f/yu3C6xTVqn@infradead.org>
 <6d4cecd5-9083-4d68-a7e2-266dae9e3952@sifive.com>
 <ZXgH6un2uLdjQ48X@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZXgH6un2uLdjQ48X@infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:12:42PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:49:53PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > Actually tracking all possibly-FPU-tainted functions and their call sites is
> > probably possible, but a much larger task.
> 
> I think objtool should be able to do that reasonably easily, it already
> does it for checking section where userspace address access is enabled
> or not, which is very similar.

Yeah, that might be doable.  I can look into it.

-- 
Josh