Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
Feedback-ID: i6a694271:Fastmail
Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2023 12:00:12 -0700
From:   Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
        antony.antony@secunet.com, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
        Eddy Z <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
        Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        devel@linux-ipsec.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 9/9] bpf: xfrm: Add selftest for
 bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state()
Message-ID: <kj5zxyxf3edmz3uyjanxukdiysagu5f6mkneq64yyqgfzp4lsd@7glieqovplgd>
References: <cover.1702325874.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
 <8ec1b885d2e13fcd20944cce9edc0340d993d044.1702325874.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
 <CAHsH6GsdqBN638uqUm+8QkP1_45coucSTL7o=D2wFW-gYjPaBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <7yjkfhrwdphtcljq3odv4jc6lucd32wcg277hfsf4ve2jbo7hp@vuqzwbq5nxjw>
 <CAHsH6Gs1vUQnhR_a4qFnAF37Vx=68Do28sfVfFxQ9pVj9jSzjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <qiv464c4y43mo5rih5k6lgzkbpnj6wsrl52hrhgbxeqj45atun@szmqlmnccm52>
 <CAHsH6Gujycb9RBuRk7QHorLe0Q=Np_tb3uboQfp9KmJnegVXvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <fwadmdjjogp4ybfxfpwovnmnn36jigffopijsuqt4ly4vxqghm@ysqhd25mzylp>
 <CAADnVQKpXpqMr9jmc8RKLcL822ir0wA7bEN2h6dEo=6Y60qgWQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQKpXpqMr9jmc8RKLcL822ir0wA7bEN2h6dEo=6Y60qgWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 08:44:42AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:17 AM Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> wrote:
> >
> >
> > If you don't mind (and there no more comments), I would prefer to send a
> > follow up fixing the nits in this revision. So that I stop blasting the
> > list (as well as people who may not be as concerned with these details).
> 
> Resending patches is little effort while follow up patches
> double the commits, more code churn, increase in code reviews, etc.
> Always address feedback by resending.

Got it; will keep that in mind.

Thanks,
Daniel